Demographic Divide

While all women are underrepresented in U.S. elected office, some demographics are more disproportionately affected than others. Factors such as race, income, sexual orientation, political party, age, and region all affect how proportional a woman’s representation will be in her local, state, and national government.

Additionally, women from some of these groups are more likely to face certain barriers to running for office, being elected to office, and succeeding when in office. We can also see specific issues that arise at the intersection of these identities - for example, fundraising for campaigns is often very challenging for low-income women of color.

 

Select a demographic category below to explore how it affects women’s representation.   

Want to help more women run, win, serve, and lead? Take Action 

 

Click on a topic to begin.

Race

While all women are underrepresented in elected office, women of color face additional barriers. 

infogram_0_woc_comparison-51Demographic Divide - Racehttps://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed.js?l8wtext/javascript

Women of color make up 20 percent of the U.S. population, but only make up:

  • 9.2% of voting members of Congress
  • 1% of governors
  • 8.3% of state legislators
  • 14.0% of mayors in 100 largest cities

infogram_0_e873cd1d-c6f1-426c-9e8f-29b863ceae3aBreakdown WOC In 117th Congresshttps://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed.js?zHJtext/javascript

There is hope for the representation of women of color moving forward. The 117th Congress features an all time high for women of color's representation, with 50 women of color serving across the House and the Senate. This upward trajectory is great news for our national progress towards gender parity; but, progress remains slow and incremental.

Check out our Milestones page to learn more about women breaking barriers throughout history.

Check out the Center for American Women and Politics to learn more about elected women of color.

Wealth

State Legislatures

Serving in public office does not often pay well, especially at the state or local level, and running a successful campaign costs money. People who are already wealthy are more likely to run for office, and thus more likely to get elected. This wealth barrier impacts women - especially women of color - disproportionately, as they typically have lower incomes and lower net worths than men.

State legislators are often not paid enough to sustain themselves and their families without additional sources of income - a problem that limits access to lower-income potential politicians. 

infogram_0_a07aa356-2f32-436f-98a9-05ec84b1451fAnnual Salaries for State Legislatureshttps://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed.js?IaCtext/javascript

Federal Government

The median net worth of a member of the U.S. congress is more than 1.1 million dollars. That’s over 22 times the national median net worth of 44,900 dollars.

The wealth discrepancy between constituents and their representatives not only means that Americans are being represented by people who don’t know what it is like to be in their shoes, but also that important decisions are often made without people of low or middle-income present in the room.

In order to make sure policies are not being created with only the wealthy in mind, we must level the playing field and create systems that allow people of all incomes to run for office.

 

Political Party

infogram_0_demographic_divide___partyDemographic Divide - Partyhttps://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed.js?TSNtext/javascript

Republican women are especially underrepresented

Republican women are less represented in elected office than Democratic women. The 117th Congress includes only 39 Republican women, compared to 105 Democratic women; even after a record breaking 17 non-incumbent Republican women won their elections. 

No third party women hold any congressional offices.

This discrepancy holds true on the state level as well, although the contrast between seats held by Democrats and Republicans is less stark. Of the 2,297 women in state legislatures, 66 percent are Democrats, 33.3 percent are Republicans, 0.4 percent are third party, and 0.6 percent are nonpartisan.

The more extreme underrepresentation of Republican women relative to Democratic women mirrors, yet exaggerates, the habits of registered voters. Fifty-six percent of registered women voters identify as Democrats or lean Democratic, compared to 37% Republican. Eight percent of registered women voters (and registered voters overall) have no partisan lean, meaning this group is dramatically underrepresented in elected office.

One of the best ways to challenge our partisan divide and bring more Republican women into elected office is the implementation of Fair Representation Voting. Fair Representation Voting combines the use of multi-member elective districts and ranked choice voting to create less polarized, and thus less partisan, electoral outcomes. This allows for our government to better represent our population, making it fairer for all Americans.

 

 

Sources: Center for American Women and PoliticsPew Research Center

LGBT+ Representation 

infogram_0_demographic_divide___lgbtDemographic Divide - LGBT+//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed.js?blhtext/javascript

The LGBT community remains underrepresented in elected office

As of 2021, 5.6 percent of Americans identify as LGBTQ+; however, only two Senators and nine Representatives (a cumulative 2.1 percent of the 117th Congress) currently identify this way. Four of the eleven openly LGBTQ+ members of Congress are female (two Senators, two Representatives).

The November 2020 election saw many first for LGBTQ+ candidate firsts at the state and local levels, to learn more about some of the winners on our Milestones page

Unless greater numbers of LGBT+ people are elected to office, LGBQT+ underrepresentation will only become more pronounced: according to recent Gallup polling, one in six adults from Generation Z identify as LGBTQ+. More openly LGBTQ+ representatives must be elected in order to accurately represent a growing population of LGBT+ constituents.

In 2021, the LGBTQ Victory Institute released a groundbreaking study on the barriers and motivators experienced by LGBTQ women considering a run for office. Notably, one of the barriers listed refers to the lack of LGBTQ women represented in office currently. 

As important as descriptive representation is for the sake democracy, having representatives in office who substantively share in the lived-experiences of their constituents (and political hopefuls) is just as important. For LGBTQ women considering a run for office, these "trailblazers" may present themselves as mentors who can answer specific questions about running for office, while also alleviating concerns about the viability of their own campaigns. 

History of LGBT+ representation

In 1998, Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) became the first openly lesbian person elected to the House of Representatives, and she became the first openly gay or lesbian person elected to the Senate in 2012. The same year, Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) was elected as the first openly bisexual member of the House of Representatives.

No transgender person has ever been elected to the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives. The first transgender member of a state legislature, Althea Garrison, was elected in Massachusetts in 1992, though her gender identity was not widely known during her campaign. In 2008, Stu Rasmussen was elected mayor of Silverton, Oregon, becoming the first openly transgender mayor elected in the U.S.

Oregon Governor Kate Brown became the first openly bisexual governor when she was appointed to the position in 2015, and was elected in her own right in 2016. 

In 2019, Sharice Davids (D, KS-03) became the first LGBT+ Native American in the U.S. House of Representatives. 

 

Check out our Milestones page to learn more about LGBT+ women breaking political barriers.

infogram_0_demographic_divide___ageDemographic Divide - Agehttps://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed.js?giVtext/javascript

Women get into politics at an older age than men

On average, women enter elected office at an older age than men. For the 117th Congress, the average age of Members of the House was 58.4 years and of the Senate, 64.3 years. Women in Congress were slightly older with the average age of women Members of the House being 58.2 and women Senators averaging 64.7 years. 

This age imbalance is consistent at the state level as well. In 2015, the NCSL released an updated breakdown of state legislator demographics. The average age of all state legislators was 56, and the average woman legislator was two years older than the men. 

“I want women to be here in greater numbers at an earlier age so that their seniority [can] start to count much sooner.”

-Nancy Pelosi, the first woman Speaker of the House of Representatives 

This age divide has been correlated with having young children, as found in research from Brown University. A study from Yale Law School summarized the issue as follows:

One reason attributed to female candidates’ delayed entrance compared to male candidates is that women usually wait until their children are grown before they run for office. Women seem to delay their political careers because of family responsibilities, and are far less likely to have young children in office.

The age gap between men and women in office means that young women, especially those with young children, are less represented in our government than young men. Additionally, for the women in office themselves, starting their political careers later means that they will have less time in office to make meaningful change.

In order to lead effectively, women must have equal access to leadership positions. A delayed start can hurt their ability to climb the leadership ladder and become successful policy-makers.

Structural reforms that both encourage young women to run for office and also support them while in office are crucial to fixing this imbalance.

 

Geographic Region

Women's representation is not consistent throughout the U.S.

The best areas of the country for women's representation in elected office are the Pacific and New England regions, while the South and Middle Atlantic continue to fall behind. 

infogram_0_fad77bb9-af8c-4e91-b796-945617266905GPI History 2014 - 2020https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed.js?1tZtext/javascript

Part of this discrepancy may have to do with how likely these regions are to vote Democratic. Fifteen of the 17 states with Gender Parity Scores of C or above either voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election or currently have two Democratic senators, a fact that reinforces the extent to which Republican women are underrepresented in our government. 

According to our Gender Parity Index Report, there is a correlation between women's representation and geographic location. The states ranked in the bottom ten GPIs are generally clustered in the Southeast and Mid-West. The majority of states with top ten GPIs are located on the West Coast.

Women's representation is not entirely dependent on geography or partisanship, but these two factors - which are highly correlated with each other - both play an important role.