Op-Eds

What’s at Stake in Louisiana v. Callais—and Why it Matters for Women

This article by RepresentWomen's Cynthia Richie Terrell was published in Ms. magazine on October 17, 2025. It covers challenges to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Share this post
Op-Eds
October 17, 2025

This article, What’s at Stake in Louisiana v. Callais—and Why it Matters for Women, by RepresentWomen's Cynthia Richie Terrell was published in Ms. magazine on October 17, 2025. Read an excerpt below.

For nearly 60 years, the Voting Rights Act has served as the cornerstone of representative democracy, ensuring that communities, regardless of race or background, have a fair opportunity to elect candidates who reflect their interests and shared experiences. Today, that cornerstone is being tested.
Wednesday’s oral arguments in Louisiana v. Callais signaled just how much is at stake for our democracy—and for women’s representation. The case challenges Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a key provision that guards against vote dilution by prohibiting racially discriminatory district maps and election practices that weaken the voices of communities of color.
When those protections are strong, women of color are better positioned not only to participate in elections but also to win them, bringing new perspectives and priorities into government. Weakening Section 2 would silence voices already underrepresented in power, particularly those of women whose leadership has long been the backbone of democratic progress.

Read the complete article here.