Research

2026 Gender Parity Index

Our Index is the leading national measure of women's representation across all 50 states at every level of government, providing data and insights on regional, partisan, and state-specific trends. RepresentWomen, our partners, policymakers, and advocates across the country are using the Index to make strategic decisions on policy and structural solutions to close the representation gap.

2026 Gender Parity Index — state-by-state grade map

RepresentWomen Institute · 13th Annual Edition · July 2026

The leading measure of women's representation in America.

Partners, policymakers, and advocates across the country use the Gender Parity Index (GPI) to make strategic decisions on policy and structural solutions to close the representation gap.

2026 Gender Parity Index report cover
2026 Gender Parity Index — state-by-state grade map
A: 50.0+ · B: 33.0–49.9 · C: 25.0–32.9 · D: 10.0–24.9 · F: 0.0–9.9

A Shared Baseline for Progress

Measuring women's representation across all 50 states since 2013, our Index is the leading national measure of women's representation across every level of government, providing data and insights on regional, partisan, and state-specific trends to inform strategic decision-making on policy and structural solutions to close the gap.

This Year's Findings

Look closer, and a different story emerges.

For over a decade, RepresentWomen has tracked women's political representation nationwide, scoring and grading every state on its progress toward gender parity. This year, the U.S. as a whole scored 28.2, a "C" grade, up slightly from 27.7 in 2025, putting the country over halfway to parity. At a glance, that sounds like momentum.

0%
change in women's share of seats since last year
Women hold the exact same share of seats at every level of government as they did a year ago, despite reaching new milestones as elected leaders this year. Proof that milestones don't necessarily parallel net gains.

Progress toward gender balance has always been slower and less stable than it appears, but thirteen years of tracking now shows why: the gap between rising candidate numbers, rising campaign funding, and flat parity scores exists because of a structural ceiling built into the election system itself.

"Women are running in record numbers. Campaign funding for women has never been higher. And still, our national parity score has barely moved. That's not a fluke of any one cycle. It's a structural ceiling, and only systems-level reform breaks through it."

— Cynthia Richie Terrell, Founder & Executive Director, RepresentWomen

State by State

Here's how that plays out.

01

Only three states have reached "A" grades

For the second time, three states have received an "A" in the Gender Parity Index. New Hampshire ranks first, with a rounded score of 53/100. Maine ranks second, with a score of 52/100, and Oregon comes in third, with a rounded score of 52/100.

02

Not every state is moving toward parity

23 states still earn a "D" grade, including Idaho, which ranks dead last out of 50 states. Even states within ten points of parity aren't guaranteed to close the gap: Washington has been "near parity" every year since 2013, proof that proximity alone doesn't translate into progress without structural reform.

03

Milestones haven't translated to net gains

Women continue to break records and reach new "firsts," but the country's overall share of political power hasn't significantly improved. Our current system asks women to run, win, and stay in office while operating under a structural ceiling.

Progress Isn't Distributed Evenly

Thirteen years of data tells us where progress has stalled.

Since 2013, each iteration of RepresentWomen's Gender Parity Index has helped to demonstrate that progress toward gender parity across all levels of government is slow and uneven. Increases in women running for office and winning have not been sustained over the last few years, and progress toward parity has slowed, but not quite stalled, as a result. Systemic change is needed to create better and more sustainable opportunities for women to get elected and build political power.

Scroll to see where progress has been made and where barriers remain. The visualizations below show both.

Click to interact
In 2013, eight states earned an "F" and none earned an "A." For the third year running, no state has earned an "F" in 2026.
Comparing the 2013 and 2026 Gender Parity Indices
In 2013, no state earned an "A." Today, three do.
How the GPI Map Has Changed Over Time, 2016 versus 2026
In 2016, seven states earned an "F" and only one earned an "A." For the third year in a row, no state has earned an "F."
Click to interact
Since 2013, the South has consistently posted the lowest average Parity Score of any U.S. region and remains the only region that has never reached an average score of 25.

Full Rankings

See exactly where your state stands.

2026 Gender Parity Scores — full 50-state ranking table
Average Gender Parity Score in 2026: 28.2

Take Action

Closing the gap requires all of us. Join the work.

If your state's score reflects a need for progress, we can help you build the case for it. Our team presents the latest GPI findings to community leaders, elected officials, advocacy organizations, and universities, walking through the methodology and discussing actionable strategies to advance women's representation.

We're also offering exclusive trainings on how to deploy the data, along with custom State Activation Packets built from the GPI findings, available through our Women's Power Collaborative. Join for free to access these bonus sessions and tailored materials.

Women Are Not a Monolith

Progress hasn't just been uneven state to state. It's been uneven by party.

Progress has also been uneven by party. Women are approaching parity within the Democratic Party nationally, while Republican women's representation has not kept pace, despite investment in recruiting them. Closing that gap is essential to reaching parity overall: a system that only produces gains for women in one party will always hit a ceiling, no matter how many candidates run or win on the other side.

"Women are not a monolith. A system that only produces gains for women in one party will always hit a ceiling, no matter how many Democratic women run and win. Every woman deserves a seat at a table designed with her in mind."

— Cynthia Richie Terrell
Composition of Women in Congress, 114th to 119th Session
43% of Democrats in Congress are women, compared to 15% of Republicans.

The Solution

What a system designed for women actually looks like.

We don't have to look far. Maine and Alaska offer a preview of what changes when the system itself is redesigned. Ranked choice voting replaces plurality elections, where a candidate can win with less than half the vote, with a guarantee of majority support, easing the vote-splitting dynamics that make it hardest for women to break through in the first place.

55% of city council seats held by women in cities that use ranked choice voting — nearly double the national rate.
RCV is suited to the scale of American democracy in a way other reforms are not: of the 520,000 elected offices in this country, more than 80 percent are local and nonpartisan, where party-based systems cannot operate.

Proportional RCV goes a step further for offices where it fits: in multi-winner contests, more than one candidate can win representation from the same election, so gains for women stack instead of simply relocating from one seat to another.

Get the Full Picture

The findings above are only a starting point.

The complete 2026 Gender Parity Index includes full state-by-state data, methodology, historical trends back to 2013, and RepresentWomen's complete analysis.

The Archive

Read past years' reports.